From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: Alias names for network interfaces Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:31:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20100119143139.1dc18162@nehalam> References: <20100112194955.GA11752@mock.linuxdev.us.dell.com> <20100113110425.GA5095@lina.inka.de> <4B4E0158.4050102@oracle.com> <20100113174610.GA10130@mdomsch-pws380.us.dell.com> <4B54953D.5030005@cineca.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , To: Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51412 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751755Ab0ASWck (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:32:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:02:19 +0530 wrote: > Sure, but this would again introduce state. And that might not help in a > heterogeneous environment. Hetrogeneous with what? Other OS's; sorry I don't care what Windows, Solaris, HP-UX or anything else uses as a rule. The point is to do the right thing. --