netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: kaber@trash.net, yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] IPv6: conntrack: Use protocol-related match routine in IPv6 connection track
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:35:45 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100125.233545.219640402.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5E53F4.4020106@cn.fujitsu.com>

From: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:31:16 +0800

> 
> IPv6 connection track and IPv6 stack separately use a different queue to 
> manage received fragments. So using protocol-related match routine.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>

This problem was also introduced by:

commit 0b5ccb2ee250136dd7385b1c7da28417d0d4d32d
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date:   Tue Dec 15 16:59:18 2009 +0100

    ipv6: reassembly: use seperate reassembly queues for conntrack and local delivery
    
    Currently the same reassembly queue might be used for packets reassembled
    by conntrack in different positions in the stack (PREROUTING/LOCAL_OUT),
    as well as local delivery. This can cause "packet jumps" when the fragment
    completing a reassembled packet is queued from a different position in the
    stack than the previous ones.
    
    Add a "user" identifier to the reassembly queue key to seperate the queues
    of each caller, similar to what we do for IPv4.
    
    Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>


      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-26  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-26  2:31 [PATCH 2/2] IPv6: conntrack: Use protocol-related match routine in IPv6 connection track Shan Wei
2010-01-26  7:35 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100125.233545.219640402.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).