From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] netfilter: ebtables: add CONFIG_COMPAT support
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100205135226.GA21611@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265334195-28120-6-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> remaining problem:
>
> The ebtables userland makefile has:
> ifeq ($(shell uname -m),sparc64)
> CFLAGS+=-DEBT_MIN_ALIGN=8 -DKERNEL_64_USERSPACE_32
> endif
>
> struct ebt_replace, ebt_entry_match etc. then contain userland-side
> padding -- this means, if this is actually used in production --
> that even if we are called from a 32 bit userland, the structures
> may already be in the right format.
>
> One possible solution would be to try to handle compat_* calls via
> the native handler and then fall back to the compat one if it fails,
> but it will cause kernel warnings like:
> kernel msg: ebtables bug: please report to author: Wrong size
>
> Thus this is not done here.
>
> I am not sure if this "userland-padding" is widely used; it looks
> incomplete (eg. I couldn't find any
> userland-padding for match/target structures; and some (eg. mark)
> do need special handling).
Just for the record:
Jan Engelhardt was so kind to try "-j mark" with the 32bit
sparc ebtables userland and reported that it is not working.
So I am not sure if I should bother with supporting the "already padded"
userland scenario, as it won't work in some cases anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 1:43 [PATCH 0/7] netfilter: ebtables: CONFIG_COMPAT support Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] netfilter: ebtables: abort if next_offset is too small Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] netfilter: ebtables: avoid explicit XT_ALIGN() in match/targets Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] netfilter: CONFIG_COMPAT: allow delta to exceed 32767 Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] netfilter: ebtables: split do_replace into two functions Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] netfilter: ebtables: add CONFIG_COMPAT support Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 13:52 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2010-02-07 22:43 ` Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] netfilter: ebt_limit: " Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 1:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] netfilter: ebtables: mark: " Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 7:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] netfilter: ebtables: " Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-05 14:00 ` Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 17:15 ` Bart De Schuymer
2010-02-05 18:02 ` David Miller
2010-02-06 13:08 ` Bart De Schuymer
2010-02-06 13:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-07 22:38 ` Florian Westphal
2010-02-07 23:19 ` Bart De Schuymer
2010-02-07 23:28 ` Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 19:53 ` Florian Westphal
2010-02-05 20:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100205135226.GA21611@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).