From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NAT regression in next tree
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:11:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100219101127.462f5fe2@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7E3D65.2030203@trash.net>
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:27:33 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le vendredi 19 février 2010 à 08:06 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> >> netfilter: restore POST_ROUTING hook in NF_HOOK_COND
> >>
> >> Commit 2249065 ("netfilter: get rid of the grossness in netfilter.h")
> >> inverted the logic for conditional hook invocation, breaking the
> >> POST_ROUTING hook invoked by ip_output().
> >>
> >> Correct the logic and remove an unnecessary initialization.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter.h b/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >> index 7007945..89341c3 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >> @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ NF_HOOK_COND(uint8_t pf, unsigned int hook, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> struct net_device *in, struct net_device *out,
> >> int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *), bool cond)
> >> {
> >> - int ret = 1;
> >> - if (cond ||
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (!cond ||
> >> (ret = nf_hook_thresh(pf, hook, skb, in, out, okfn, INT_MIN) == 1))
> >> ret = okfn(skb);
> >> return ret;
> >
> > I dont quite get it
> >
> > Original code was :
> >
> >
> > #define NF_HOOK_COND(pf, hook, skb, indev, outdev, okfn, cond) \
> > ({int __ret; \
> > if ((cond) || (__ret = nf_hook_thresh(pf, hook, (skb), indev, outdev, okfn, INT_MIN)) == 1)\
> > __ret = (okfn)(skb); \
> > __ret;})
> >
> >
> > There was no condition inversion.
>
> Right, I quoted the wrong patch, it was actually broken in
> 23f3733 ("netfilter: reduce NF_HOOK by one argument"), which
> moved the cond check from nf_hook_thresh() to NF_HOOK_COND().
Yes, this fixes the problem I was seeing.
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-19 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100216173658.519b6245@nehalam>
[not found] ` <201002171526.02493.arnd@arndb.de>
2010-02-19 1:36 ` NAT regression in next tree Stephen Hemminger
2010-02-19 5:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-19 5:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-02-19 7:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-19 7:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-19 7:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-19 18:11 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100219101127.462f5fe2@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).