From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: compute message size properly
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:21:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100331182116.GB2822@psychotron.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB38A8A.9050501@trash.net>
Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 07:46:50PM CEST, kaber@trash.net wrote:
>Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Message size should be dependent on net->ct.sysctl_acct, not on
>> CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT definition.
>
>Krzysztof actually wanted to get rid of the config option entirely
>some time ago, but at that time there were some (now solved) problems
>that prevented his. I've CCed him, hoping that this will finally
>get completed :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>> index 569410a..2b0cfa4 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>> @@ -426,6 +426,19 @@ ctnetlink_proto_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
>> }
>>
>> static inline size_t
>> +ctnetlink_counters_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
>> +{
>> + struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
>> +
>> + if (!net->ct.sysctl_acct)
>> + return 0;
>> + return 2 * nla_total_size(0) /* CTA_COUNTERS_ORIG|REPL */
>> + + 2 * nla_total_size(sizeof(uint64_t)) /* CTA_COUNTERS_PACKETS */
>> + + 2 * nla_total_size(sizeof(uint64_t)) /* CTA_COUNTERS_BYTES */
>> + ;
>
>This is also not fully correct since the sysctl only affects newly
>created conntracks, existing ones still have counters that are dumped.
>I'd suggest to simple check whether the conntrack has an accounting
>extension.
Okay, I see your point. How about this:
Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: compute message size properly V2
Message size should be dependent on net->ct.sysctl_acct, not on
CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT definition.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index 569410a..44487d8 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -426,6 +426,17 @@ ctnetlink_proto_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
}
static inline size_t
+ctnetlink_counters_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
+{
+ if (!nf_ct_ext_exist(ct, NF_CT_EXT_ACCT))
+ return 0;
+ return 2 * nla_total_size(0) /* CTA_COUNTERS_ORIG|REPL */
+ + 2 * nla_total_size(sizeof(uint64_t)) /* CTA_COUNTERS_PACKETS */
+ + 2 * nla_total_size(sizeof(uint64_t)) /* CTA_COUNTERS_BYTES */
+ ;
+}
+
+static inline size_t
ctnetlink_nlmsg_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct nfgenmsg))
@@ -435,11 +446,7 @@ ctnetlink_nlmsg_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
+ 3 * nla_total_size(sizeof(u_int8_t)) /* CTA_PROTO_NUM */
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u_int32_t)) /* CTA_ID */
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u_int32_t)) /* CTA_STATUS */
-#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT
- + 2 * nla_total_size(0) /* CTA_COUNTERS_ORIG|REPL */
- + 2 * nla_total_size(sizeof(uint64_t)) /* CTA_COUNTERS_PACKETS */
- + 2 * nla_total_size(sizeof(uint64_t)) /* CTA_COUNTERS_BYTES */
-#endif
+ + ctnetlink_counters_size(ct)
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u_int32_t)) /* CTA_TIMEOUT */
+ nla_total_size(0) /* CTA_PROTOINFO */
+ nla_total_size(0) /* CTA_HELP */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 15:11 [net-next-2.6 PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: compute message size properly Jiri Pirko
2010-03-31 17:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-31 18:21 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2010-03-31 18:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-01 10:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-01 10:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2010-04-01 10:50 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100331182116.GB2822@psychotron.redhat.com \
--to=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ole@ans.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).