From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: if6_get_next() fix Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 13:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100503.132442.200112018.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1272916007.2407.75.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100503.130902.172620141.davem@davemloft.net> <1272917635.2407.106.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, kaber@trash.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1272917635.2407.106.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org =46rom: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 22:13:55 +0200 > Le lundi 03 mai 2010 =E0 13:09 -0700, David Miller a =E9crit : >> From: Eric Dumazet >> Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 21:46:47 +0200 >>=20 >> > Then, net-next-2.6 doesnt yet have your commit Paul to relax >> > hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(), so its a bit difficult to continue the= work. >>=20 >> Is that in Linus's tree yet? If it propagates there I can make it >> propagate to net-next-2.6, you just have to tell me you need it. >=20 >=20 > Hmm, it seems it's already in net-next-2.6, sorry for the confusion. No problem, just let me know in the future if something upstream needs to propagate.