From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 08:43:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503154357.GF2597@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5112.1272900590@localhost>
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:29:50AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:58:46 +0200, Eric Dumazet said:
> > Le lundi 03 mai 2010 à 10:30 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu a écrit :
>
> > > [ 9.129872] net/netfilter/nf_log.c:55 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
>
> > Thanks for the report !
> >
> > [PATCH] net: nf_log RCU fixes
> >
> > nf_log_register() and nf_log_unregister() use a mutex to have exclusive
> > access to nf_logers[]. Use appropriate rcu_dereference_protected()
> > lockdep annotation.
>
> Confirming that one fixed. Now it lives a whole 36 seconds before whinging:
>
> [ 35.328729] ===================================================
> [ 35.328803] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 35.328837] ---------------------------------------------------
> [ 35.328872] net/ipv6/addrconf.c:2977 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> [ 35.328926]
> [ 35.328927] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 35.328928]
> [ 35.329016]
> [ 35.329016] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> [ 35.329089] 2 locks held by ifconfig/2680:
> [ 35.329120] #0: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810f5db8>] seq_read+0x3a/0x42d
> [ 35.329217] #1: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<ffffffff814eec68>] rcu_read_lock_bh+0x0/0x35
> [ 35.329322]
> [ 35.329323] stack backtrace:
> [ 35.329380] Pid: 2680, comm: ifconfig Tainted: G W 2.6.34-rc5-mmotm0428 #3
> [ 35.329439] Call Trace:
> [ 35.329471] [<ffffffff81064832>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
> [ 35.329514] [<ffffffff814ef3ae>] if6_get_next+0x34/0x6d
> [ 35.329554] [<ffffffff814ef3f8>] if6_seq_next+0x11/0x18
> [ 35.329595] [<ffffffff810f6083>] seq_read+0x305/0x42d
> [ 35.329635] [<ffffffff810f5d7e>] ? seq_read+0x0/0x42d
> [ 35.329676] [<ffffffff81129e8c>] proc_reg_read+0x8d/0xac
> [ 35.329717] [<ffffffff810db7e0>] vfs_read+0xe0/0x140
> [ 35.329758] [<ffffffff810db8f6>] sys_read+0x45/0x69
> [ 35.329799] [<ffffffff810025eb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Maybe I need to go and stick the "RCU whinge multiple times" patch on this
> kernel and get it over with. :)
Highly recommended. ;-)
And thanks to you for your testing efforts and to Eric for the fixes!!!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201004290021.o3T0L04Y028017@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2010-05-02 17:46 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 5:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:55 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 15:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 15:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 16:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 16:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-10 16:12 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 16:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-03 14:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 14:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 15:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-05-03 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 19:46 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: if6_get_next() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 20:09 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 20:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 20:24 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 22:17 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 22:54 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 16:53 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503154357.GF2597@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).