From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100510.091257.51273494.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1272865436.2173.182.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100502.225509.233880079.davem@davemloft.net> <4BE8290A.2080707@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: kaber@trash.net Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35892 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752634Ab0EJQMw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2010 12:12:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BE8290A.2080707@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Patrick McHardy Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:40:58 +0200 > I queued this patch in nf-next, the only reason why I haven't > submitted it yet is that I was unable to get git to cleanly export > only the proper set of patches meant for -next due to a few merges, > it insists on including 5 patches already merged upstream. If you > don't mind ignoring the first 5 patches in the series, I'll send a > pull request tonight. Something like "git format-patch origin" doesn't avoid those upstream commits? Weird... Another trick is to specify a commit range using triple-dot "..." notation, such as "origin...master"