From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:57:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610065702.GB1915@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1006091719010.30265@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:20:37PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 2010-06-09 17:16, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 2010-06-09 16:16, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >>>>> You could use the NOTRACK target to bypass connection tracking.
> >>>>>
> >>>> I tried the NOTRACK target, but the packet is still going
> >>>> throught reassembly, because the RAW filter has lower priority
> >>>> then the connection track defragmentation..
> >>>
> >>> Right.
> >>
> >> Blech. That reminds me of
> >> http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=126581823826735&w=2
> >
> >We already fixed that.
>
> I know, and I posted it for the understanding of the OP
> as to why RAW is after DEFRAG.
thanks, it's helpful
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100604112708.GA1958@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4C08EB85.3050900@trash.net>
[not found] ` <20100607145558.GA1939@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
2010-06-09 14:16 ` no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket Patrick McHardy
2010-06-09 15:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-09 15:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-09 15:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-10 6:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2010-06-10 6:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10 9:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-10 9:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10 10:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-11 8:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-11 9:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-11 13:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15 6:53 ` [PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-15 9:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15 9:49 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100610065702.GB1915@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).