From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] extensions: libxt_CHECKSUM extension Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:00:05 +0300 Message-ID: <20100711200005.GD12202@redhat.com> References: <20100711151453.GA7563@redhat.com> <20100711190020.GA11244@redhat.com> <20100711195208.GB12202@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57021 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752835Ab0GKUFU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:05:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:03:44PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Sunday 2010-07-11 21:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Sunday 2010-07-11 21:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >The problem happens in the field with virtualized applications. For > >> >> >reference, see Red Hat bz 605555, as well as > >> >> >http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg37660.html > >> >> > >> >> Added to Xtables-addons. > >> > > >> >Please do not drop the explanation that bits were copied from ECN.c. > >> > >> As far as I see it, there is nothing that deals with ECN in any way. > > > >No, the bits I copied deal with libxt boilerplate. > > Falls into the category of triviality, doesn't reach a level of originality. In that case the 2002 copyright doesn't need to be there as well? -- MST