From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
ja@ssi.bg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [patch nf-next] IPVS: ICMPv6 checksum calculation
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:57:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100818055716.GA32429@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimW6UszuFspN+S3m8WdS1dPcwTmy+m2kT4X+7MR@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:20:14PM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote:
> 2010/8/18 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
> > From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:21:49 +0900
> >
> >> [ CCing netdev for comment ]
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > ...
> >>> May be ip_vs_checksum_complete() is not needed here?
> >>> Also, skb->csum is not valid for every ip_summed value.
> >>> May be we need to apply CHECKSUM_PARTIAL kind of setup for the IPv6.
> >>> Such example is net/ipv6/udp.c:udp6_ufo_send_check().
> >>> Later dev_queue_xmit() and skb_checksum_help() should take care
> >>> for the next steps. Something like this can be tested:
> >>>
> >>> icmph->icmp6_cksum = csum_ipv6_magic(&iph->saddr,
> >>> &iph->daddr,
> >>> skb->len - icmp_offset, IPPROTO_ICMPV6,
> >>> 0);
> >>> skb->csum_start = skb_network_header(skb) - skb->head +
> >>> icmp_offset;
> >>> skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct icmp6hdr, icmp6_cksum);
> >>> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> >>>
> >
> > Yes, using CHECKSUM_PARTIAL unconditionally would work.
> >
> Thanks, I learned this. You gave me a big cake.
[ please don't top-post ]
Xiaoyu, are you in a position to test the code proposed by Julian?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-18 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 7:00 [patch nf-next] IPVS: ICMPv6 checksum calculation Simon Horman
2010-08-17 9:25 ` Julian Anastasov
2010-08-18 0:21 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-18 0:26 ` David Miller
2010-08-18 4:20 ` xiaoyu Du
2010-08-18 5:57 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2010-08-20 11:14 ` xiaoyu Du
2010-08-20 13:48 ` Julian Anastasov
2010-08-23 2:54 ` xiaoyu Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100818055716.GA32429@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tingsrain@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).