netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] IPVS: convert scheduler management to RCU
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:31:52 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100820143148.GA2277@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282313150.2484.65.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 21:44 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I'm still getting my head around RCU, so review would be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > It occurs to me that this code is not performance critical, so
> > > perhaps simply replacing the rwlock with a spinlock would be better?
> > >
> > > Index: nf-next-2.6/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sched.c
> 
> 
> > > -       write_unlock_bh(&__ip_vs_sched_lock);
> > > +       list_del_rcu(&scheduler->n_list);
> > > +       spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_sched_mutex);
> > 
> > Need a rcu_barrier_bh().
> > 
> > >
> > >        /* decrease the module use count */
> > >        ip_vs_use_count_dec();
> 
> 
> Quite frankly, if this is not performance critical, just use the
> spinlock (and dont use 'mutex' in its name ;) )

Will do.

> Using RCU here will force at least one RCU grace period at dismantle
> time...
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-20 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-20 13:33 [rfc] IPVS: convert scheduler management to RCU Simon Horman
2010-08-20 13:44 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-20 14:00   ` Simon Horman
2010-08-20 14:05   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-20 14:16     ` yao zhao
2010-08-20 14:32       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-20 15:04         ` yao zhao
2010-08-20 15:32           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-20 17:54             ` yao zhao
2010-08-20 14:33       ` Simon Horman
2010-08-20 14:31     ` Simon Horman [this message]
2010-08-20 13:59 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-20 19:29   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-08-21  3:28     ` Simon Horman
2010-08-20 18:03 ` Julian Anastasov
2010-08-21  3:30   ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100820143148.GA2277@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).