From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:09:54 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208.090954.115924303.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291379941-31565-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:38:59 +0100
> The current jhash.h implements the lookup2() hash function by Bob Jenkins.
> However, lookup2() is outdated as Bob wrote a new hash function called
> lookup3(). There is a longer comparison of those two and other hash
> functions at http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html.
>
> Please consider applying the following patches.
Patch #1 is already in the net-next-2.6 tree, and as long as there are
no major objections to the general crowd (including Rusty et al.) I am
happy to put patch #2 into my tree as well.
Rusty, does the current version of patch #2 look good to you?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-25 13:15 [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-11-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] Prepare the tree for un-inlined jhash Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-11-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] The new jhash implementation Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-11-25 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-25 13:55 ` Changli Gao
2010-11-25 14:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-25 14:41 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-11-25 17:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-25 21:14 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-11-27 3:31 ` Rusty Russell
2010-12-03 12:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-03 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Remove calls to jhash internals Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-03 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] The new jhash implementation Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-08 17:09 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-12-08 21:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function Rusty Russell
2010-12-10 4:19 ` David Miller
2010-11-25 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Prepare the tree for un-inlined jhash Jan Engelhardt
2010-11-25 13:57 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101208.090954.115924303.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).