From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20101208.090954.115924303.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <201011271401.22773.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
	<1291379941-31565-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au
To: kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1291379941-31565-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Date: Fri,  3 Dec 2010 13:38:59 +0100

> The current jhash.h implements the lookup2() hash function by Bob Jenkins. 
> However, lookup2() is outdated as Bob wrote a new hash function called 
> lookup3(). There is a longer comparison of those two and other hash
> functions at http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html.
> 
> Please consider applying the following patches.

Patch #1 is already in the net-next-2.6 tree, and as long as there are
no major objections to the general crowd (including Rusty et al.) I am
happy to put patch #2 into my tree as well.

Rusty, does the current version of patch #2 look good to you?

Thanks!