From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:19:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101209.201926.104055585.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1291379941-31565-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> <20101208.090954.115924303.davem@davemloft.net> <201012090753.46050.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35734 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755561Ab0LJETA (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:19:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201012090753.46050.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Rusty Russell Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:53:45 +1030 > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:39:54 am David Miller wrote: >> From: Jozsef Kadlecsik >> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:38:59 +0100 >> >> > The current jhash.h implements the lookup2() hash function by Bob Jenkins. >> > However, lookup2() is outdated as Bob wrote a new hash function called >> > lookup3(). There is a longer comparison of those two and other hash >> > functions at http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html. >> > >> > Please consider applying the following patches. >> >> Patch #1 is already in the net-next-2.6 tree, and as long as there are >> no major objections to the general crowd (including Rusty et al.) I am >> happy to put patch #2 into my tree as well. >> >> Rusty, does the current version of patch #2 look good to you? > > Yes, 2/2 good. Thanks Jozsef! > > Acked-by: Rusty Russell Applied, thanks everyone.