netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next-2.6] netfilter: x_tables: dont block BH while reading counters
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:12:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216121238.53deb370@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292529519.2655.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:58:39 +0100
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:

> Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 09:57 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:53:06 +0100
> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -759,7 +742,7 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(const struct xt_table *table)
> > >  	 * about).
> > >  	 */
> > >  	countersize = sizeof(struct xt_counters) * private->number;
> > > -	counters = vmalloc(countersize);
> > > +	counters = vzalloc(countersize);
> > >  
> > >  	if (counters == NULL)
> > >  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > @@ -1007,7 +990,7 @@ static int __do_replace(struct net *net, const char *name,
> > >  	struct arpt_entry *iter;
> > >  
> > >  	ret = 0;
> > > -	counters = vmalloc(num_counters * sizeof(struct xt_counters));
> > > +	counters = vzalloc(num_counters * sizeof(struct xt_counters));
> > >  	if (!counters) {
> > >  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >  		goto out;
> > 
> > This seems like a different and unrelated change.
> > 
> 
> Since you later Acked the patch, you probably know that we now provide
> to get_counters() a zeroed area, since we do a sum for each possible
> cpu, I am answering anyway for other readers ;)
> 
> Thanks for reviewing !

You changed from:
  get local cpu counters
  then sum other cpus
to:
  sum all cpu's.

This is fine, and will give the same answer. 

-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-14 14:46 Possible regression: Packet drops during iptables calls Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-14 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-14 16:09   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-14 16:24     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 14:04       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-16 14:12         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 14:24           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-16 14:29             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 15:02               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 16:07                 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] netfilter: ip_tables: dont block BH while reading counters Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 16:53                   ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 17:31                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-16 17:53                       ` [PATCH v3 net-next-2.6] netfilter: x_tables: " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 17:57                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-16 19:58                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 20:12                             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-12-16 20:40                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 17:57                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-18  4:29                         ` [PATCH v4 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-20 13:42                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-20 14:45                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 16:48                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-01-08 16:45                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-09 21:31                             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-12-16 14:13         ` Possible regression: Packet drops during iptables calls Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 14:20         ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101216121238.53deb370@nehalam \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@comx.dk \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).