From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libmnl 1.0.0 release Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:22:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101221.122225.39203217.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4D0CABC3.3090601@netfilter.org> <4D110BDC.4000709@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jengelh@medozas.de, lists@sterenborg.info, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D110BDC.4000709@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:19:40 +0100 > I think that this approach (see patch) is safe to fix this problem. This is fine for now, but really you should have a copy of the headers in your tree. It's the only way to sanely control the build in all possible scenerios. The kernel headers are just too large of a variable for things like this.