From: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>,
"kaber@trash.net" <kaber@trash.net>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETFILTER module xt_hmark new target for HASH MARK
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:40:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102031840.37099.hans@schillstrom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1102031731010.30984@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
--
Mvh
Hasse Schillstrom
070-699 7150
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 17:32:07 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Thursday 2011-02-03 17:08, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >>> Hm, this is actually not straight forward to implement, you'll have to
> >>> use hook functions to avoid the module dependencies with conntrack and
> >>> that's pretty annoying.
> >>>
> >>> I don't come up with a good solution for this.
> >>
> >> If it loads conntrack always, there is the option to shovel it
> >> into xt_connmark.c.
> >
> >the problem is that Hans wants this not to depend on conntrack always.
>
> Well you porbably won't get around the nf_conntrack module dependency,
> but conntrack can still be disabled through CT --notrack
> if one does not like the runtime cost.
>
If you do put this in front of a bunch of load balancers,
there is probably a lot of traffic :-)
So that's the reason why I don't want do depend upon conntrack.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 13:34 [PATCH 0/2] NETFILTER new target module, HMARK Hans Schillstrom
2011-02-03 13:34 ` [PATCH] NETFILTER module xt_hmark new target for HASH MARK Hans Schillstrom
2011-02-03 13:51 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-02-03 14:23 ` Hans Schillstrom
2011-02-03 15:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-02-03 16:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-02-03 16:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-02-03 16:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-02-03 16:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-02-03 17:40 ` Hans Schillstrom [this message]
2011-02-03 17:37 ` Hans Schillstrom
2011-02-04 13:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 13:34 ` [PATCH] NETFILTER userspace part for target HMARK Hans Schillstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102031840.37099.hans@schillstrom.com \
--to=hans@schillstrom.com \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).