From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 status... Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:56:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20110316175642.GB2867@psychotron.redhat.com> References: <20110316065008.GA2780@psychotron.redhat.com> <20110316.000251.189704695.davem@davemloft.net> <20110316073803.GB2780@psychotron.redhat.com> <20110316.103857.226773145.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org, kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110316.103857.226773145.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:38:57PM CET, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko >Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:38:03 +0100 > >> Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:02:51AM CET, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org wrote: >>>From: Jiri Pirko >>>Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:50:09 +0100 >>> >>>>>Jiri, I know there is your patch set there, but I think you and Changli >>>>>still need to go back and forth one more time wrt. orig_dev semantics. >>>>>Since you have been posting this patch set for some time I'm still >>>>>willing to apply it for this merge window, but please make haste and >>>>>work out the remaining discussion. Thank you. >>>> >>>> Dave, you can apply the rest of the series and leave only the first >>>> patch (af_packet) out. There's no dependency. We will figure out things >>>> around origdev later. >>> >>>I was about to do that but I've found other problems. >>> >>>You cannot make the modifications you make to linux/if.h, those >>>interface flags are visible to userspace. >> >> What do you suggest? To remove unused flags and leave gaps there or to >> not to remove the flags at all? > >You can't remove them, otherwise if it happened to be reference in the >sources to some app out there, it will start to fail to compile. > >This is pretty obvious stuff, I hope :-) Ok :( So would you leave out if.h hunk out or should I repost? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html