From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup. Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 08:15:31 +0900 Message-ID: <20110501231530.GR10017@verge.net.au> References: <1304058334-17594-1-git-send-email-hans@schillstrom.com> <20110429064225.GA23958@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Hans Schillstrom , "ja@ssi.bg" , "ebiederm@xmission.com" , "lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" To: Hans =?utf-8?Q?Schillstr=C3=B6m?= Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0200, Hans Schillstr=C3=B6m wrote: >=20 > >Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup. > > > >On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:25:28AM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > This patch series handles exit from a network name space. > > > >Hi Hans, > > > >thanks for your work on this. > >I've looked over the patches and nothing catches my eye - > >thanks for fixing up the things that I commented on previously. > > > >I think that patches 1 and 2 should be targeted at 2.6.39, > >while the remainder look like 2.6.40 material. Does that > >sound reasonable to you? >=20 > I do prefer to keep them together,=20 > but if you want it in that way it's OK for me. I understand that you'd like to keep things together, but I think its too much change for .39 this late in the rc series. > We are doing a lot of tests right now with this patch set. > If we found any issues I'll let you know. Thanks