From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Jan Springl Subject: Implicit loading of module xt_set. Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:13:55 +0100 Message-ID: <201107051713.55991.steven@springl.ukfsn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.springl.ukfsn.org ([84.45.199.6]:50260 "EHLO mail.springl.ukfsn.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755313Ab1GEQTb (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:19:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.springl.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434CF21350 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:13:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.springl.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (l2.home [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bY9mZXa4sLcT for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:13:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from l3.home (l3.home [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad51:24:250:daff:fe6d:bbdd]) by mail.springl.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A22720D22 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:13:56 +0100 (BST) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello The following command implicitly loads module xt_set: ip6tables -A INPUT -m set --match-set sjs src -j ACCEPT However, the following command does not implicitly load module xt_set: iptables -A INPUT -m set --match-set sjs src -j ACCEPT Instead the following message is issued: iptables: No chain/target/match by that name. Is this behaviour expected? Steven.