From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] netfilter: Remove unnecessary OOM logging messages Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:55:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20110830.135502.179848097213434762.davem@davemloft.net> References: <13c1c12486cae409dfa5254b1435e660f2b17e05.1314650069.git.joe@perches.com> <4E5CDBAA.6040001@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joe@perches.com, bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be, wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, ja@ssi.bg, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org To: kaber@trash.net Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E5CDBAA.6040001@trash.net> Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org From: Patrick McHardy Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:46:34 +0200 > On 29.08.2011 23:17, Joe Perches wrote: >> Removing unnecessary messages saves code and text. >> >> Site specific OOM messages are duplications of a generic MM >> out of memory message and aren't really useful, so just >> delete them. > > Looks good to me. Do you want me to apply this patch or are you > intending to have the entire series go through Dave? I'm happy with subsystem folks taking things in if they want, the B.A.T.M.A.N. guys did this earlier today for example.