netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Hiroshi KIHIRA <hiro@dump-Storage.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iptables-restore: new option to change the commit timing
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:28:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110912092807.GB2194@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E68C314.3070709@dump-Storage.net>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:28:52PM +0900, Hiroshi KIHIRA wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I propose to add a new command line option to iptables-restore.
> The following patch introduces a new command line option which changes
> the timing of the action of table commitment.
> 
> In the situation that some tables are restored, each of tables are
> applied into the kernel space when the COMMIT statement was read from
> the input. If there was a syntax error in rules, iptables-restore
> will end without doing any modification to the table. However the
> table that was already committed into kernel space does not reverted.
> It causes a inconsistency between the tables. (e.g., some marked
> packets are dropped at filter table, but do not marked any packet at
> mangle table)

I think people should call iptables-restore -T to test the rule-set
before, at least the first time the have saved the rule-set, to make
sure that they don't run into inconsistencies.

Applying the rule-set partially for one table may also result in
inconsistencies, so I still don't see what we gain from allowing this.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-12  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-08 13:28 [PATCH RFC] iptables-restore: new option to change the commit timing Hiroshi KIHIRA
2011-09-08 15:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-08 15:06   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-08 15:22     ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-09  5:26       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-09-10 17:27       ` Hiroshi KIHIRA
2011-09-12  9:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2011-09-12 11:52   ` Hiroshi KIHIRA
2011-09-12 18:19     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110912092807.GB2194@1984 \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=hiro@dump-Storage.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).