From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
kaber@trash.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix ->nfnl NULL oops
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:35:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111109143510.GB24158@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32FF200DF1281ACA19CF3807@nimrod.local>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:50:05PM +0000, Alex Bligh wrote:
> --On 9 November 2011 01:16:35 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan
> <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Sorry for delay.
> >
> >I recall myself writing that net->nfnl NULL check is racy or
> >something like that (but I can't find this email in archives).
> >
> >I've read the code once again, and I'm quite sure,
> >NULL ->nfnl check is correct if RCU precautions are made.
>
> Your patch looks better than mine in this respect (as far as I
> can tell from code reading rather than testing)
>
> >Regarding ->report check, I think it's bogus.
>
> All I can tell is that net->nfnl == NULL is a condition that happens
> in practice. If that is read, race free, and treated as something
> that causes nfnetlink_has_listeners to return 0 irrespective of
> item_report, then the oops will not occur. So from my point of view
> it seems right.
>
> Note that in the mean time I think my patch made -stable.
That's news.
I personally NACKed that patch.
Can you confirm that, please?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-09 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-08 22:16 [PATCH] netfilter: fix ->nfnl NULL oops Alexey Dobriyan
2011-11-08 22:50 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-09 14:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2011-11-09 19:04 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-09 14:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-11-09 19:06 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-15 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-11-15 10:13 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-15 14:09 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-11-21 23:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-11-21 23:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-11-21 23:50 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-22 14:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111109143510.GB24158@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox