From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix ->nfnl NULL oops Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20111115140920.GA31321@1984> References: <20111108221634.GA13261@p183.telecom.by> <20111109143423.GA24158@1984> <20111115095642.GA28944@1984> <61996646E807F2E67842E57F@nimrod.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , kaber@trash.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Bligh Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:47248 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755850Ab1KOOJ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:09:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61996646E807F2E67842E57F@nimrod.local> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:13:58AM +0000, Alex Bligh wrote: > Pablo, > > Have you tried this patch (without the ->nfnl NULL check change) with > the perl program I wrote that reliably replicates the original bug? > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-backport-natty/+bug/843892 > > specifically the attachment in comment #6: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-backport-natty/+bug/843892/+attachment/2382526/+files/testns.pl I didn't test my patch yet, I just wanted to ping you that I was looking into this.