From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: Modify the SH scheduler to use weights Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 01:49:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20111208004900.GA22241@1984> References: <1323245223-13646-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <1323245223-13646-2-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <20111207113038.GA18166@1984> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Simon Horman , Patrick McHardy , lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Wensong Zhang , Julian Anastasov To: Mike Maxim Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:41901 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756897Ab1LHAtL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:49:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Mike Maxim wrote: > The reason I put that in is because the size of that table becomes > more relevant/important if you decide to use the weights in the manner > the patch lets you. It would be conceivable that someone might need to > increase the size of that table to accommodate their configuration, so > I thought it would be handy to be able to do that through the regular > configuration system instead of editing the source. That explains that chunk. Would you mind resubmitting the patch including this description in the patch and removing the unnecessary line deletion / addition? Thanks!