From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: libnetfilter_acct now available at git.netfilter.org
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20111230112615.GA12080@1984>
References: <20111229184741.GA6405@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1112292221210.29747@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
 <20111230000546.GC7866@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1112300205270.18357@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:45871 "EHLO mail.us.es"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751851Ab1L3L0X (ORCPT <rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:26:23 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1112300205270.18357@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:09:11AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Well, do you expect nfacct to grow to proportions similar to ipset or
> conntrack-tools?

No way ;-)

> As for nfnl_osf, it certainly has not reached that threshold (and
> is unlikely to do so in the near future), and therefore I move to keep it.

OK, let's keep it in the iptables tree then.