From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: iptables: build updates and fixes Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:58:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20111230115849.GC12204@1984> References: <1325208902-2014-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:50407 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753063Ab1L3L6w (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:58:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1325208902-2014-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:34:55AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > The following changes since commit b8c42eca0f224a00bf55b60ded81af14a1e07da1: > libiptc: provide separate pkgconfig files (2011-12-18 02:52:32 +0100) > > are available FOR REVIEW in the git repository at: > git://dev.medozas.de/iptables stable > > Jan Engelhardt (6): > Update .gitignore > build: use AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR and stash away tools > Update .gitignore > build: use delayed expansion on the user-settable variables > extensions: link on libxtables and check symbols > nfnl_osf: add missing libnfnetlink_CFLAGS to compile process No objections regarding this patchset. Only thing is that I'd like to reduce the changes on the -stable branch to the strictly neccessary. This is the only way to reduce the chances that someone comes and say that we have broken something in -stable. Would you be OK if this goes to master instead?