From: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:15:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201042215.20290.hans@schillstrom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120104174035.GB3489@1984>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 985 bytes --]
Hello Again
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 18:40:35 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:48:35PM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > I like that idea, an "early" table at prio -500 with PREROUTING.
> > There is also a need for a new flag "--allfrags"
> > i.e. all fragments needs to be sorted out and sent to same dest for defrag.
> >
> > ex.
> > iptables -t early -A PREROUTING -i eth0 --allfrags -j NOTRACK
>
> New tables add too much overhead. We have discussed this before with
> Patrick.
>
Only if loaded ..
It would have been the perfect solution.
Is the discussion about the overhead on the list (I can't find it)?
I made a quick test with an "early" table
and --allfrags fix (for IPv4) and it works really good.
iptables -t early -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -a -j NOTRACK
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -a -j HMARK --mod 3 --offs 100
So your opinion is no more tables,
even if it's rare that it is loaded?
Regards
Hans
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-04 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 8:07 [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 8:28 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 8:49 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 9:03 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 9:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-01-04 9:47 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 17:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 9:49 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 10:18 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 11:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-01-04 11:48 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 17:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 18:05 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 20:56 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 21:40 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-05 7:19 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-05 9:11 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-05 14:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-09 8:58 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-10 3:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 20:45 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 21:15 ` Hans Schillstrom [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201042215.20290.hans@schillstrom.com \
--to=hans@schillstrom.com \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).