From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:17:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110031714.GA31483@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201201090958.43017.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > I wonder if we can conditionally register the sysctl only if we are
> > inside one lxc container.
> >
> Sure no problem, but the code will not be so nice ...
Indeed, ugly indeed.
> > I'm telling this because this sysctl does not seem to make any sense
> > to me outside of it.
>
> I'm not so sure that we should make it asymetric,
> but it's not a big deal.
>
> Anyway here is a sample of the sysctl in a namespace.
> It is the "if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) {..." that does the magic
Hm, after having a look at it, I think I prefer to provide some
inconditional sysctl.
Better call it nf_conntrack_enable and set it to 1 by default. AFAICS,
this will be a synonymous of:
iptables -I PREROUTING -t raw -j NOTRACK
This option is disabling conntracking after all. I don't think we
would ever support conntrack with fragments.
Please, send a patch including in the description that we need this
for lxc, I'll enqueue it for net-next unless someone raise the hand
with a better solution.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 8:07 [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 8:28 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 8:49 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 9:03 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 9:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-01-04 9:47 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 17:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 9:49 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 10:18 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 11:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-01-04 11:48 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 17:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 18:05 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 20:56 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 21:40 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-05 7:19 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-05 9:11 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-05 14:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-09 8:58 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-10 3:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-01-04 20:45 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 21:15 ` Hans Schillstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120110031714.GA31483@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).