From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: nf_queue: fix queueing of bridged gro skbs
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:37:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120209163701.GB14772@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120209154421.GA5865@1984>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
[ CC'd Herbert ]
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:23:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > When trying to nf_queue GRO/GSO skbs, nf_queue uses skb_gso_segment
> > to split the skb.
> >
> > However, if nf_queue is called via bridge netfilter, the mac header
> > won't be preserved -- packets will thus contain a bogus mac header.
> >
> > Fix this by setting skb->data to the mac header when skb->nf_bridge
> > is set and restoring skb->data afterwards for all segments.
>
> Better fix skb_gso_segment to handle this case?
I don't see how -- is skb_gso_segment broken?
It treats skb->data as the starting point of the
segmentation, so I think its the callers job to make skb->data
point at the right place (network header, mac header, ...)
How would skb_gso_segment know where it should start?
Changing skb_gso_segment to use skb_mac_header() as starting
point doesn't really help: What if you don't want to copy the mac header/no
mac header exists (yet)?
Also, br_netfilter skb_pull()s the MAC header (and also the vlan header if
brnf_filter_vlan_tagged sysctl is on), so skb->len has been reduced.
Herbert, dou you have any opionion on this?
The only other alternative that I see is to declare
'GRO + bridge + NF_QUEUE as unsupported' and just tell people to
turn GRO off (ie., add a printk_once warning in nf_queue).
For reference, the discussed patch is below:
index b3a7db6..ce60cf0 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
@@ -203,6 +203,27 @@ err:
return status;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
+/* When called from bridge netfilter, skb->data must point to MAC header
+ * before calling skb_gso_segment(). Else, original MAC header is lost
+ * and segmented skbs will be sent to wrong destination.
+ */
+static void nf_bridge_adjust_skb_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ if (skb->nf_bridge)
+ __skb_push(skb, skb->network_header - skb->mac_header);
+}
+
+static void nf_bridge_adjust_segmented_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ if (skb->nf_bridge)
+ __skb_pull(skb, skb->network_header - skb->mac_header);
+}
+#else
+#define nf_bridge_adjust_skb_data(s) do {} while (0)
+#define nf_bridge_adjust_segmented_data(s) do {} while (0)
+#endif
+
int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct list_head *elem,
u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hook,
@@ -212,7 +233,7 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned int queuenum)
{
struct sk_buff *segs;
- int err;
+ int err = -EINVAL;
unsigned int queued;
if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
@@ -228,23 +249,25 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
break;
}
+ nf_bridge_adjust_skb_data(skb);
segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0);
/* Does not use PTR_ERR to limit the number of error codes that can be
* returned by nf_queue. For instance, callers rely on -ECANCELED to mean
* 'ignore this hook'.
*/
if (IS_ERR(segs))
- return -EINVAL;
-
+ goto out_err;
queued = 0;
err = 0;
do {
struct sk_buff *nskb = segs->next;
segs->next = NULL;
- if (err == 0)
+ if (err == 0) {
+ nf_bridge_adjust_segmented_data(segs);
err = __nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev,
outdev, okfn, queuenum);
+ }
if (err == 0)
queued++;
else
@@ -252,11 +275,12 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
segs = nskb;
} while (segs);
- /* also free orig skb if only some segments were queued */
- if (unlikely(err && queued))
- err = 0;
- if (err == 0)
+ if (queued) {
kfree_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ out_err:
+ nf_bridge_adjust_segmented_data(skb);
return err;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 12:23 [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: nf_queue: fix queueing of bridged gro skbs Florian Westphal
2012-02-09 15:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-02-09 16:37 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2012-02-09 18:44 ` David Miller
2012-02-09 19:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120209163701.GB14772@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).