From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: patch in bugzilla Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 14:39:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20120303133915.GA18857@1984> References: <20120229125052.GA1115@1984> <20120229232739.GB3817@1984> <20120302164209.GA13687@1984> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonh Wendell , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Sander Lindgren To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:58708 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752172Ab2CCNjR (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:39:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 09:28:10PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >Your patch will break other programs made by people like you that use > >libiptc. > > > >Jan? > > iptc is the last thing I want on my todo list :) Me too :-) > Talk to Jasper, who has more or less an actual overview about > what is and could be using libiptc externally. > Meanwhile see this untested proposal of mine.. Jesper, we're having this discussion again. I don't mind about applying this patch as a workaround for this case but I don't like the idea of keep adding function2() things in the future. libiptc has been broken many times in the past. Let us know.