netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: drop malformed IPv4 packets
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:14:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120404151446.GB4148@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204041357510.20388@blackhole.kfki.hu>

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:07:45PM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:41:19PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 21:36 +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> > > > It was reported that the Linux kernel sometimes logs:
> > > > 
> > > > klogd: [2629147.402413] kernel BUG at net / netfilter /
> > > > nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c: 447!
> > > > klogd: [1072212.887368] kernel BUG at net / netfilter /
> > > > nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c: 392
> > > > 
> > > > ipv4_get_l4proto() in nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c and tcp_error() in
> > > > nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c should catch malformed packets, so the errors
> > > > at the indicated lines - TCP options parsing - should not happen.
> > > > However, tcp_error() relies on the "dataoff" offset to the TCP header,
> > > > calculated by ipv4_get_l4proto().  But ipv4_get_l4proto() does not check
> > > > bogus ihl values in IPv4 packets, which then can slip through tcp_error()
> > > > and get caught at the TCP options parsing routines.
> > > > 
> > > > The patch fixes ipv4_get_l4proto() by dropping packets with bogus
> > > > ihl value.
> > > > 
> > > > The patch closes netfilter bugzilla id 771.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> > > > ---
> > > >  net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c |    8 ++++++++
> > > >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
> > > > index de9da21..c93d052 100644
> > > > --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
> > > > +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
> > > > @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ static int ipv4_get_l4proto(const struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int nhoff,
> > > >  	*dataoff = nhoff + (iph->ihl << 2);
> > > >  	*protonum = iph->protocol;
> > > >  
> > > > +	/* Check bogus IP headers */
> > > > +	if (*dataoff > skb->len) {
> > > > +		pr_debug("nf_conntrack_ipv4: drop bogus IPv4 packet: "
> > > > +			 "nhoff %u, ihl %u, skblen %u\n",
> > > > +			 nhoff, iph->ihl << 2, skb->len);
> > > > +		return -NF_ACCEPT;
> > > 
> > > 		return -NF_DROP; ?
> > 
> > The connection tracking system should not drop packets. Well, we
> > sometimes do in special cases.
> > 
> > I think -NF_ACCEPT is fine, the user can add one rule to drop INVALID
> > packets (like this one) from iptables.
> 
> That's a nontrivial question and currently we are inconsistent: in 
> ipv4_get_l4proto() we drop all broken packets (IP header is incomplete or 
> fragments) and the condition above just adds a third category. However, in 
> ipv6_get_l4proto() we simply mark them as INVALID and in tcp_error() we do 
> the same.

Thanks for spotting that.

> So, should we convert ipv4_get_l4proto() to mark all broken packets as 
> INVALID?

Yes, I think we should stick to -NF_ACCEPT so we let the user drop the
packet via iptables.

BTW, if you send a follow-up patch for this, it would be also good to
log invalid packets in ipv4_get_l4proto. There's no nf_log_packet
invocation for these.

      reply	other threads:[~2012-04-04 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-03 19:36 [PATCH 0/1] Drop malformed IPv4 packets in conntrack Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-04-03 19:36 ` [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: drop malformed IPv4 packets Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-04-03 19:41   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-03 19:55     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-04-04 11:23     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-04-04 12:07       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-04-04 15:14         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120404151446.GB4148@1984 \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).