* [v2 PATCH 1/6] netfilter: Add new netlink NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN
2012-05-08 9:43 [v2 PATCH 0/6] netfilter: "fail-open" feature support for NFQUEUE Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 9:43 ` Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 11:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 2/6] netfilter: Change enqueue handlers return values Krishna Kumar
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar @ 2012-05-08 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber, pablo; +Cc: vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, Krishna Kumar, sri
Define a new netlink message: NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -ruNp org/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h new/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h
--- org/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h 2012-05-08 09:16:41.969050136 +0530
+++ new/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h 2012-05-08 09:39:10.334761077 +0530
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ enum nfqnl_attr_config {
NFQA_CFG_CMD, /* nfqnl_msg_config_cmd */
NFQA_CFG_PARAMS, /* nfqnl_msg_config_params */
NFQA_CFG_QUEUE_MAXLEN, /* __u32 */
+ NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN, /* __u8 */
__NFQA_CFG_MAX
};
#define NFQA_CFG_MAX (__NFQA_CFG_MAX-1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [v2 PATCH 1/6] netfilter: Add new netlink NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN
2012-05-08 9:43 ` [v2 PATCH 1/6] netfilter: Add new netlink NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 11:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2012-05-08 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krishna Kumar; +Cc: kaber, vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, sri
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:13:54PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> Define a new netlink message: NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff -ruNp org/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h new/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h
> --- org/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h 2012-05-08 09:16:41.969050136 +0530
> +++ new/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h 2012-05-08 09:39:10.334761077 +0530
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ enum nfqnl_attr_config {
> NFQA_CFG_CMD, /* nfqnl_msg_config_cmd */
> NFQA_CFG_PARAMS, /* nfqnl_msg_config_params */
> NFQA_CFG_QUEUE_MAXLEN, /* __u32 */
> + NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN, /* __u8 */
> __NFQA_CFG_MAX
> };
> #define NFQA_CFG_MAX (__NFQA_CFG_MAX-1)
The patch logic that you use is not correct. One new feature, one
patch, please.
In case it gets big, then you can split changes following this logic:
patches that prepare the new feature first, then the patches that
contain the feature.
In this case, you have to put everything into one single patch.
Please, send one single patch for this new feature.
Moreover, rename NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN to NFAQ_CFG_FLAGS and declare:
#define NFAQ_CFG_F_FAIL_OPEN (1 << 0)
Then, check for that flag in the code to enable the fail open
behaviour.
I have another feature here that will use those flags for another
option.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [v2 PATCH 2/6] netfilter: Change enqueue handlers return values
2012-05-08 9:43 [v2 PATCH 0/6] netfilter: "fail-open" feature support for NFQUEUE Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 9:43 ` [v2 PATCH 1/6] netfilter: Add new netlink NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 9:44 ` Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 3/6] netfilter: Add support for per-queue fail-open Krishna Kumar
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar @ 2012-05-08 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber, pablo; +Cc: vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, Krishna Kumar, sri
Since fail-open is designed to return >0 to upper layer,
change ipqueue to return 0 as success, instead of skb->len.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -ruNp org/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c new/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c
--- org/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c 2012-05-08 09:15:36.435049552 +0530
+++ new/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c 2012-05-08 09:39:53.808091036 +0530
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ ipq_enqueue_packet(struct nf_queue_entry
__ipq_enqueue_entry(entry);
spin_unlock_bh(&queue_lock);
- return status;
+ return 0;
err_out_free_nskb:
kfree_skb(nskb);
diff -ruNp org/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c new/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c
--- org/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c 2012-05-08 09:15:36.433050383 +0530
+++ new/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c 2012-05-08 09:39:45.828858720 +0530
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ ipq_enqueue_packet(struct nf_queue_entry
__ipq_enqueue_entry(entry);
spin_unlock_bh(&queue_lock);
- return status;
+ return 0;
err_out_free_nskb:
kfree_skb(nskb);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [v2 PATCH 3/6] netfilter: Add support for per-queue fail-open
2012-05-08 9:43 [v2 PATCH 0/6] netfilter: "fail-open" feature support for NFQUEUE Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 9:43 ` [v2 PATCH 1/6] netfilter: Add new netlink NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 2/6] netfilter: Change enqueue handlers return values Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 9:44 ` Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 4/6] netfilter: Add fail-open support to handler Krishna Kumar
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar @ 2012-05-08 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber, pablo; +Cc: vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, Krishna Kumar, sri
Add support for per-queue fail-open
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -ruNp org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
--- org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 09:15:36.442049628 +0530
+++ new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 09:56:41.274129649 +0530
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct nfqnl_instance {
u_int16_t queue_num; /* number of this queue */
u_int8_t copy_mode;
+ u_int8_t fail_open; /* whether fail-open enabled */
/*
* Following fields are dirtied for each queued packet,
* keep them in same cache line if possible.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [v2 PATCH 4/6] netfilter: Add fail-open support to handler
2012-05-08 9:43 [v2 PATCH 0/6] netfilter: "fail-open" feature support for NFQUEUE Krishna Kumar
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 3/6] netfilter: Add support for per-queue fail-open Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 9:44 ` Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 11:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 5/6] netfilter: GSO packet handling Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 6/6] netfilter: Enable fail-open support Krishna Kumar
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar @ 2012-05-08 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber, pablo; +Cc: vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, Krishna Kumar, sri
Change NFQUEUE handler to return >0 value on queue full
to signify "fail-open".
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -ruNp org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
--- org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 12:57:39.225755227 +0530
+++ new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 12:57:55.515816567 +0530
@@ -433,11 +433,16 @@ nfqnl_enqueue_packet(struct nf_queue_ent
goto err_out_free_nskb;
}
if (queue->queue_total >= queue->queue_maxlen) {
- queue->queue_dropped++;
- if (net_ratelimit())
- printk(KERN_WARNING "nf_queue: full at %d entries, "
- "dropping packets(s).\n",
- queue->queue_total);
+ if (queue->fail_open) {
+ /* Accept the packet temporarily skipping rules */
+ err = 1;
+ } else {
+ queue->queue_dropped++;
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "nf_queue: full at %d "
+ "entries, dropping packets(s).\n",
+ queue->queue_total);
+ }
goto err_out_free_nskb;
}
entry->id = ++queue->id_sequence;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [v2 PATCH 4/6] netfilter: Add fail-open support to handler
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 4/6] netfilter: Add fail-open support to handler Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 11:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2012-05-08 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krishna Kumar; +Cc: kaber, vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, sri
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:14:30PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> Change NFQUEUE handler to return >0 value on queue full
> to signify "fail-open".
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff -ruNp org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> --- org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 12:57:39.225755227 +0530
> +++ new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 12:57:55.515816567 +0530
> @@ -433,11 +433,16 @@ nfqnl_enqueue_packet(struct nf_queue_ent
> goto err_out_free_nskb;
> }
> if (queue->queue_total >= queue->queue_maxlen) {
> - queue->queue_dropped++;
> - if (net_ratelimit())
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "nf_queue: full at %d entries, "
> - "dropping packets(s).\n",
> - queue->queue_total);
> + if (queue->fail_open) {
> + /* Accept the packet temporarily skipping rules */
> + err = 1;
Please, return -ENOSPC and handle this special case in nf_queue.
> + } else {
> + queue->queue_dropped++;
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "nf_queue: full at %d "
> + "entries, dropping packets(s).\n",
> + queue->queue_total);
> + }
> goto err_out_free_nskb;
> }
> entry->id = ++queue->id_sequence;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [v2 PATCH 5/6] netfilter: GSO packet handling
2012-05-08 9:43 [v2 PATCH 0/6] netfilter: "fail-open" feature support for NFQUEUE Krishna Kumar
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 4/6] netfilter: Add fail-open support to handler Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 9:44 ` Krishna Kumar
2012-05-08 12:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 6/6] netfilter: Enable fail-open support Krishna Kumar
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar @ 2012-05-08 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber, pablo; +Cc: vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, Krishna Kumar, sri
Handle >0 return value from outfn in __nf_queue(). This value
is not passed up the stack but intercepted by nf_queue(), which
returns 0 to upper layers.
Also add support for GSO skb. If __nf_queue() returns >0 to
indicate fail-open, we call okfn() immediately.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_queue.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -ruNp org/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c new/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
--- org/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c 2012-05-08 13:02:18.163816400 +0530
+++ new/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c 2012-05-08 15:08:11.028555335 +0530
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *sk
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (status < 0) {
+ if (status) {
nf_queue_entry_release_refs(entry);
goto err;
}
@@ -236,9 +236,18 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
int err = -EINVAL;
unsigned int queued;
- if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
- return __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
+ if (!skb_is_gso(skb)) {
+ err = __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
queuenum);
+ if (err > 0) {
+ /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
+ * returned >0 indicating fail-open - temporarily
+ * accept packets.
+ */
+ err = okfn(skb);
+ }
+ return err;
+ }
switch (pf) {
case NFPROTO_IPV4:
@@ -268,14 +277,26 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
err = __nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev,
outdev, okfn, queuenum);
}
- if (err == 0)
+
+ if (err == 0) {
queued++;
- else
+ } else if (err > 0) {
+ /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
+ * returned >0 indicating fail-open - accept
+ * this and remaining segments.
+ */
+ okfn(segs);
+ } else {
+ /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
+ * returned <0 - free this and remaining skb
+ * segments.
+ */
kfree_skb(segs);
+ }
segs = nskb;
} while (segs);
- if (queued) {
+ if (queued || err > 0) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [v2 PATCH 5/6] netfilter: GSO packet handling
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 5/6] netfilter: GSO packet handling Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 12:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-10 4:20 ` Krishna Kumar2
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2012-05-08 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krishna Kumar; +Cc: kaber, vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, sri
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> Handle >0 return value from outfn in __nf_queue(). This value
> is not passed up the stack but intercepted by nf_queue(), which
> returns 0 to upper layers.
>
> Also add support for GSO skb. If __nf_queue() returns >0 to
> indicate fail-open, we call okfn() immediately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_queue.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff -ruNp org/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c new/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> --- org/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c 2012-05-08 13:02:18.163816400 +0530
> +++ new/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c 2012-05-08 15:08:11.028555335 +0530
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *sk
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - if (status < 0) {
> + if (status) {
> nf_queue_entry_release_refs(entry);
> goto err;
> }
> @@ -236,9 +236,18 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> int err = -EINVAL;
> unsigned int queued;
>
> - if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
> - return __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> + if (!skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> + err = __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> queuenum);
> + if (err > 0) {
> + /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
> + * returned >0 indicating fail-open - temporarily
> + * accept packets.
> + */
> + err = okfn(skb);
You cannot invoke okfn here. If you do so, you'll skip the remaining
hooks.
Return the error and handle the -ENOSPC in nf_hook_slow.
(Note that the -ENOSPC is the error value I'm proposing you to use for
this special case).
> + }
> + return err;
> + }
>
> switch (pf) {
> case NFPROTO_IPV4:
> @@ -268,14 +277,26 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> err = __nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev,
> outdev, okfn, queuenum);
> }
> - if (err == 0)
> +
> + if (err == 0) {
> queued++;
> - else
> + } else if (err > 0) {
> + /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
> + * returned >0 indicating fail-open - accept
> + * this and remaining segments.
> + */
> + okfn(segs);
> + } else {
> + /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
> + * returned <0 - free this and remaining skb
> + * segments.
> + */
> kfree_skb(segs);
> + }
> segs = nskb;
> } while (segs);
>
> - if (queued) {
> + if (queued || err > 0) {
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [v2 PATCH 5/6] netfilter: GSO packet handling
2012-05-08 12:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2012-05-10 4:20 ` Krishna Kumar2
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar2 @ 2012-05-10 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Cc: fw, kaber, netfilter-devel, sri, Sulakshan Vajipayajula, vivk
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote on 05/08/2012 05:58:28 PM:
> > + if (!skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> > + err = __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> > queuenum);
> > + if (err > 0) {
> > + /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
> > + * returned >0 indicating fail-open - temporarily
> > + * accept packets.
> > + */
> > + err = okfn(skb);
>
> You cannot invoke okfn here. If you do so, you'll skip the remaining
> hooks.
>
> Return the error and handle the -ENOSPC in nf_hook_slow.
>
> (Note that the -ENOSPC is the error value I'm proposing you to use for
> this special case).
Are you suggesting to change nf_hook_slow to:
if (err == -ENOSPC || err == -ECANCELED)
goto next_hook;
In that case, how should the GSO case be handled (code below)?
Thanks for your feedback,
- KK
> > @@ -268,14 +277,26 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > err = __nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev,
> > outdev, okfn, queuenum);
> > }
> > - if (err == 0)
> > +
> > + if (err == 0) {
> > queued++;
> > - else
> > + } else if (err > 0) {
> > + /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
> > + * returned >0 indicating fail-open - accept
> > + * this and remaining segments.
> > + */
> > + okfn(segs);
> > + } else {
> > + /* Queue failed due to queue-full and handler
> > + * returned <0 - free this and remaining skb
> > + * segments.
> > + */
> > kfree_skb(segs);
> > + }
> > segs = nskb;
> > } while (segs);
> >
> > - if (queued) {
> > + if (queued || err > 0) {
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> > return 0;
> > }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [v2 PATCH 6/6] netfilter: Enable fail-open support.
2012-05-08 9:43 [v2 PATCH 0/6] netfilter: "fail-open" feature support for NFQUEUE Krishna Kumar
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-08 9:44 ` [v2 PATCH 5/6] netfilter: GSO packet handling Krishna Kumar
@ 2012-05-08 9:44 ` Krishna Kumar
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Krishna Kumar @ 2012-05-08 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber, pablo; +Cc: vivk, svajipay, fw, netfilter-devel, Krishna Kumar, sri
Process NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN and enable fail-open support.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@us.ibm.com>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff -ruNp org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
--- org/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 12:58:49.844754291 +0530
+++ new/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 2012-05-08 12:59:03.280923680 +0530
@@ -867,6 +867,19 @@ nfqnl_recv_config(struct sock *ctnl, str
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
}
+ if (nfqa[NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN]) {
+ u_int8_t *fail_open;
+
+ if (!queue) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_out_unlock;
+ }
+ fail_open = nla_data(nfqa[NFQA_CFG_FAIL_OPEN]);
+ spin_lock_bh(&queue->lock);
+ queue->fail_open = *fail_open;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
+ }
+
err_out_unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread