From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net: Use net_<level>_ratelimit
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:14:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20120515.141423.885518974251878746.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <cover.1336981915.git.joe@perches.com>
	<20120515.134531.530903973750646107.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1337104765.7050.24.camel@joe2Laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, coreteam-Cap9r6Oaw4JrovVCs/uTlw@public.gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-decnet-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-sctp-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netfilter-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1337104765.7050.24.camel@joe2Laptop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://openvswitch.org/mailman/options/dev>,
	<mailto:dev-request-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>,
	<mailto:dev-request-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

From: Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:59:25 -0700

> I could produce a net_printk_ratelimited that would keep
> the original behavior if necessary.
> 
> 	net_printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG etc...)

I don't think it's worth the hassle, we'd rather get people
into the habit of using dynamic_debug.