From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/12] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:06:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20120618090631.GA27067@1984> References: <1339818083-31356-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120616105037.GA18251@1984> <4FDE7D5F.5080703@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Gao feng Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDE7D5F.5080703@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:59:11AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > =E4=BA=8E 2012=E5=B9=B406=E6=9C=8816=E6=97=A5 18:50, Pablo Neira Ayus= o =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > >> commit 2c352f444ccfa966a1aa4fd8e9ee29381c467448 > >> (netfilter: nf_conntrack: prepare namespace support for > >> l4 protocol trackers) register proto before register sysctl. > >> > >> it changes the behavior that when register sysctl failed, the > >> proto should not be registered too. > >> > >> so change to register sysctl before register protos. > >=20 > > Could you explain why we need to change the order in the registrati= on? > > ie. now first proto->init_net then sysctl things. >=20 > before commit 2c352f444ccfa966a1aa4fd8e9ee29381c467448, we register s= ysctl before > register protos, so if sysctl is registered faild, the protos will no= t be registered. >=20 > but now, we register protos first, and when register sysctl failed, w= e can use protos > too, it's different from before. That makes sense. IMO, this is the thing that should be included in the description.