From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:20:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625112029.GB4607@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340289410-17642-4-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:36:41PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> Now, nf_proto_net's users is confusing.
> we should regard it as the refcount for l4proto's per-net data,
> because maybe there are two l4protos use the same per-net data.
>
> so increment pn->users when nf_conntrack_l4proto_register
> success, and decrement it for nf_conntrack_l4_unregister case.
>
> because nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv[4|6] don't use the same per-net
> data,so we don't need to add a refcnt for their per-net data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> index 9d6b6ab..63612e6 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
[...]
> @@ -458,23 +446,32 @@ int nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(struct net *net,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
>
> if (l4proto->init_net) {
> ret = l4proto->init_net(net, l4proto->l3proto);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> + if (pn == NULL)
> + goto out;
Same thing here, we're leaking memory allocated by l4proto->init_net.
> + ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>
> if (net == &init_net) {
> ret = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register_net(l4proto);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> + goto out;
Better replace the two lines above by:
goto out_register_net;
and then...
> + }
> }
>
> + pn->users++;
out_register_net:
nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> +out:
> return ret;
I think that this change is similar to patch 1/1, I think you should
send it as a separated patch.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_l4proto_register);
> @@ -499,10 +496,18 @@ nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> void nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister(struct net *net,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
> +
> if (net == &init_net)
> nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(l4proto);
>
> - nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> + if (pn == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + pn->users--;
> + nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> +
> /* Remove all contrack entries for this protocol */
> rtnl_lock();
> nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(net, kill_l4proto, l4proto);
> @@ -514,11 +519,15 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> int err;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
> + &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> +
> err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.init_net(net,
> nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.l3proto);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> err = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net,
> + pn,
> &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> @@ -528,13 +537,20 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
> rcu_assign_pointer(nf_ct_l3protos[i],
> &nf_conntrack_l3proto_generic);
> }
> +
> + pn->users++;
> return 0;
> }
>
> void nf_conntrack_proto_fini(struct net *net)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
> + &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> +
> + pn->users--;
> nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net,
> + pn,
> &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> if (net == &init_net) {
> /* free l3proto protocol tables */
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-21 14:36 [PATCH 01/13] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 02/13] netfilter: add parameter proto for l4proto.init_net Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 03/13] netfilter: add nf_ct_kfree_compat_sysctl_table to make codes clear Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 04/13] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data Gao feng
2012-06-25 11:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-06-26 3:58 ` Gao feng
2012-06-26 14:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-27 1:34 ` Gao feng
2012-06-27 9:05 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 05/13] netfilter: fix memory leak when register sysctl failed Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 06/13] netfilter: merge tcpv[4,6]_net_init into tcp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 07/13] netfilter: merge udpv[4,6]_net_init into udp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 08/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_udplite[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 09/13] netfilter: merge sctpv[4,6]_net_init into sctp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 10/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 11/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_dccp[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 12/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_icmp cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 13/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_icmpv6 cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-25 11:12 ` [PATCH 01/13] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-26 3:40 ` Gao feng
2012-06-26 14:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-27 1:38 ` Gao feng
2012-06-27 8:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625112029.GB4607@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).