From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] netfilter: cleanup use of the term "IPs"
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:43:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712154324.GD18793@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341964350-13809-3-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:52:28AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Seen meticulously, we have two IPs these days (Internet Protocol 4,
> and 6). Clean up and explicitly use "IP addresses" to disambiguate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig | 15 ++++++++-------
> net/netfilter/xt_recent.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig b/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig
> index f987138..e098980 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig
> @@ -238,13 +238,14 @@ config IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS
> range 4 20
> default 8
> ---help---
> - The source hashing scheduler maps source IPs to destinations
> - stored in a hash table. This table is tiled by each destination
> - until all slots in the table are filled. When using weights to
> - allow destinations to receive more connections, the table is
> - tiled an amount proportional to the weights specified. The table
> - needs to be large enough to effectively fit all the destinations
> - multiplied by their respective weights.
> + The source hashing scheduler maps source IP addresses to
> + destinations stored in a hash table. This table is tiled by
> + each destination until all slots in the table are filled.
> + When using weights to allow destinations to receive more
> + connections, the table is tiled an amount proportional to
> + the weights specified. The table needs to be large enough
> + to effectively fit all the destinations multiplied by their
> + respective weights.
>
> comment 'IPVS application helper'
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
> index b980b3f..0acc17f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
> @@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ module_param(ip_pkt_list_tot, uint, 0400);
> module_param(ip_list_perms, uint, 0400);
> module_param(ip_list_uid, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> module_param(ip_list_gid, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_tot, "number of IPs to remember per list (>0)");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_tot, "number of IP addresses to remember per list (>0)");
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_pkt_list_tot, "number of packets per IP address to remember (1-255)");
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_hash_size, "size of hash table used to look up IPs");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_hash_size, "size of hash table used to look up IP addresses");
Isn't it this the module parameter that you just delete it in the
previous patch?
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_perms, "permissions on /proc/net/xt_recent/* files");
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_uid, "default owner of /proc/net/xt_recent/* files");
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ip_list_gid, "default owning group of /proc/net/xt_recent/* files");
> --
> 1.7.7
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 23:52 xt_recent cleanups, xt_SYSRQ Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-10 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xt_recent: remove ip_list_hash_size parameter Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-12 15:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-07-10 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] netfilter: cleanup use of the term "IPs" Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-12 15:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-07-10 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] netfilter: use permission mnemonics in module_param Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-10 23:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_SYSRQ Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-12 15:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-07-12 16:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-12 20:26 ` Florian Westphal
2012-07-12 20:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-12 20:35 ` Florian Westphal
2012-07-12 21:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-13 9:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-07-14 1:43 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-07-14 13:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-07-14 14:49 ` Aft nix
2012-07-14 15:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712154324.GD18793@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).