Re: That's pretty much it for 3.5.0

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:50:16 -0700

> On 7/17/2012 12:24 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:09:53 -0700
>>
>>> although we don't have an early_init hook for netprio_cgroup so this
>>> is probably not correct.
>>
>> The dependency is actually on net_dev_init (a subsys_initcall) rather
>> than a pure_initcall.
>>
>> net_dev_init is what registers the netdev_net_ops, which in turn
>> initializes the netdev list in namespaces such as &init_net
>>
> 
> Ah right thanks sorry for the thrash. I guess we need to check if the
> netdev list in the init_net namespace is initialized.

It's a hack, but we could export and then test dev_boot_phase == 0,
and if that test is true then skip the init_net device walk in the
cgroup code.

But I don't like that very much.

The things this code cares about can't even be an issue until
net_dev_init() runs.

There is a comment warning not to do this in linux/init.h, but we
could change the module_init() in netprio_cgroup.c to some level which
runs after subsys_inticall().  When built as a module, linux/init.h
will translate this into module_init() which is basically the behavior
we want.