From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nfacct: add timestamp option Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:54:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20120803145400.GA1454@1984> References: <1343856436-11129-1-git-send-email-eric@regit.org> <1343856436-11129-6-git-send-email-eric@regit.org> <20120803093533.GE12107@1984> <1343987038.3284.6.camel@tiger.regit.org> <20120803112449.GA19641@1984> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Leblond Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:60607 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753052Ab2HCOyF (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:54:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120803112449.GA19641@1984> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:24:49PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [...] > I'm still undecided, but it seems to me we provide more fine-grain > control if timestamp is calculated in the output for the nfacct case. Well, most input plugins already provide timestamp calculation. GPRINT seems to be the exception for the output plugin case. I have applied the patch expanding the documentation on the example file a bit. Thanks Eric.