From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: PTR_RET can be used Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:51:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20120820145144.GA18676@1984> References: <20120729004550.GA7049@localhost> <5015280A.6000105@bfs.de> <20120729121449.GA16489@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: walter harms , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML To: Fengguang Wu Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:52798 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756827Ab2HTOv4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:51:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120729121449.GA16489@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 08:14:49PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > --- linux.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_filter.c 2012-07-29 08:41:09.703759534 +0800 > > > +++ linux/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_filter.c 2012-07-29 08:41:14.255759643 +0800 > > > @@ -100,9 +100,7 @@ static struct nf_hook_ops ebt_ops_filter > > > static int __net_init frame_filter_net_init(struct net *net) > > > { > > > net->xt.frame_filter = ebt_register_table(net, &frame_filter); > > > - if (IS_ERR(net->xt.frame_filter)) > > > - return PTR_ERR(net->xt.frame_filter); > > > - return 0; > > > + return PTR_RET(net->xt.frame_filter); > > > } > > > > > > > i do not understand this, > > ebt_register_table() return (struct ebt_table *) on success > > > > Does PTR_RET really return 0 if this is a propper pointer ? > > Right. Here is how PTR_RET defined. This patch does not change any behavior. > > static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr) > { > if (IS_ERR(ptr)) > return PTR_ERR(ptr); > else > return 0; > } Applied, thanks Fengguang.