From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Oliver <olipro@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] death_by_event() does not check IPS_DYING_BIT - race condition against ctnetlink_del_conntrack
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:34:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120830103437.GA13756@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5239380.eElFyXbOPg@gentoovm>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:09:01AM +0200, Oliver wrote:
> On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:50:09 you wrote:
> > Not sure what you mean, you're still crashing with the patch below,
> > right?
> >
> > My proposal is to give a try to the ecache patch, that requires
> > removing the previous patch.
>
> Apologies for the confusion; the patch quoted is essentially the first patch
> you provided me, with my changes to make it work in 3.4.10 *plus* the deletion
> of the change to nf_conntrack_ecache.h where your patch deleted the
> nf_ct_is_dying() check (i.e I have this check left in) - with this
> modification, I find that conntrackd is well-behaved and I have thus far not
> successfully caused a kernel panic.
>
> Having tested your latest patch, I can also confirm that it also does not
> crash, including at exhaustion of the conntrack table.
>
> In terms of overall stability, I would presume your latest patch is superior
> to the previous (i.e. what I attached most recently) ?
Yes, I prefer the second patch. There is still races in the first
patch I sent you, harder to trigger, but still there.
There are several cleanups I'd like to recover from the first patch
though. Would you help testing them?
Thanks a lot for testing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 9:33 [PATCH] death_by_event() does not check IPS_DYING_BIT - race condition against ctnetlink_del_conntrack Oliver
2012-08-28 10:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-28 17:16 ` Oliver
2012-08-28 23:10 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 0:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30 2:05 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 2:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
[not found] ` <5427975.6moJlq4F9d@gentoovm>
[not found] ` <20120830025009.GA16782@1984>
2012-08-30 3:09 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-08-30 12:28 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 12:39 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 16:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30 17:49 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 18:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-31 0:19 ` Oliver
2012-08-31 9:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120830103437.GA13756@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olipro@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).