From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] netfilter: remove xt_NOTRACK Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:31:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20120903153121.GA19926@1984> References: <1345962219-2999-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= , Cong Wang , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy , "David S. Miller" , netfilter@vger.kernel.org To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:56268 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932316Ab2ICPbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:31:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:57:53PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Jan Engelhardt wro= te: > > On Sunday 2012-08-26 12:42, Maciej =C5=BBenczykowski wrote: > > > >>Sounds like the old -t raw ... -j NOTRACK is replaced by -t raw ...= -j > >>CT --notrack. > >>Will -j NOTRACK continue to work? Could it be added as an alias to= CT? > > > > No, and, dunno. There are currently no provisions for aliasing in t= he > > userspace side. >=20 > So no objections from you, right? :) Applied, thanks. I think it can be possible to rewrite the iptables NOTRACK user-space extension to use the CT target. Still I would need to check if some more sophisticated aliasing can be possible. And iptables-save will show the CT target though, but that shouldn't be a problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html