[RFC PATCH 2/2] netfilter: More users of ipv6_find_hdr_cb()

[Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>]

Functions tproxy_tg6_v1() and socket_mt6_v1 could use the
CB cached version of ipv6_find_hdr().

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>

---
Could someone with tproxy or socket experience tell me,
if the SKB CB data can survive this far?


 net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c |    2 +-
 net/netfilter/xt_socket.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
index d7f1953..c73b713 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ tproxy_tg6_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
 	int thoff = 0;
 	int tproto;
 
-	tproto = ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &thoff, -1, NULL, NULL);
+	tproto = ipv6_find_hdr_cb(skb, &thoff, -1, NULL, NULL);
 	if (tproto < 0) {
 		pr_debug("unable to find transport header in IPv6 packet, dropping\n");
 		return NF_DROP;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_socket.c b/net/netfilter/xt_socket.c
index 9ea482d..4feca50 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_socket.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_socket.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ socket_mt6_v1(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
 	int thoff = 0, tproto;
 	const struct xt_socket_mtinfo1 *info = (struct xt_socket_mtinfo1 *) par->matchinfo;
 
-	tproto = ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &thoff, -1, NULL, NULL);
+	tproto = ipv6_find_hdr_cb(skb, &thoff, -1, NULL, NULL);
 	if (tproto < 0) {
 		pr_debug("unable to find transport header in IPv6 packet, dropping\n");
 		return NF_DROP;