From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] netfilter: remove xt_NOTRACK Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20120904085813.GA24911@1984> References: <1345962219-2999-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20120903153121.GA19926@1984> <20120903192455.GA3527@1984> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Cong Wang , Cong Wang , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy , "David S. Miller" , netfilter@vger.kernel.org To: Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:46516 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754625Ab2IDI6T (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 04:58:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:29:40PM -0700, Maciej =C5=BBenczykowski wrot= e: [...] > > Not solved: > > 4. Since NOTRACK now always maps to CT, "-j NOTRACK" > > has become unusable on sufficiently old kernels. > > Should we even bother? >=20 > Yes, we must, otherwise distros can't upgrade to latest iptables > without either patching or upgrading kernel. Why not? They will upgrade and they will start using the CT target sooner than any other, which seems good to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html