netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] iptables: fix order of internal commands list
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 00:13:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120930221319.GA18227@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1209302313540.28050@nerf07.vanv.qr>

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:25:42PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Sunday 2012-09-30 23:09, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:22:09PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> Specifying -S on the command line would add 4096 (0x1000, 1<<12) to the
> >> cmd flags, but -S was in fact commands_v_options[13]. This led to a
> >> bogus option checking and an error message:
> >> 
> >> $ iptables -A foo -S
> >> iptables v1.4.14: Cannot use -E with -A
> >
> >Are you fixing old bugs?
> >This works here:
> ># iptables -A foo -S
> >iptables v1.4.15: Cannot use -S with -A
> 
> Hm.
> 
> >http://git.netfilter.org/[...]h=067a9baf6dc82babe466078ab3c05354c7741271
> 
> You only changed the "cmdflags" variable so that it lines up with
> the CMD_ flags, however, you forgot to line up "commands_v_options"
> as well.
> 
> Indeed your patch 067a9baf fixes "cannot use $that with $that".
> My commit message was wrong, as I was misled by v1.4.14 behavior.
> In fact, I had the real issue written down first. Approximate
> excerpt from the reflog:
> 
> 
>     iptables: fix order of command flags for option parser
>     
>     Specifying -S on the command line would add 4096 (0x1000, 1<<12) to the
>     cmd flags, but -S was in fact commands_v_options[13].
>     
>     This problem never manifested itself before, because the [8]-[13] mostly
>     had the same 'x' pattern. Now, when trying to allow --line-numbers for
>     -S, the issue showed itself as --line-numbers was still rejected even
>     after swapping 'x' for ' '.
>     
>     References: http://bugs.debian.org/642173
> 
> 
> Does that make more sense?

Yes, that log description looks correct to me. Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-30 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-30 10:22 Mostly documentation fixes Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 01/17] doc: clean up interpunction in state list for xt_conntrack Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 02/17] doc: deduplicate extension descriptions into a new manpage Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 03/17] doc: trim "state" manpage and reference conntrack instead Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 04/17] doc: have NOTRACK manpage point to CT instead Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 05/17] doc: mention iptables-apply in the SEE ALSO sections Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 06/17] iptables: fix order of internal commands list Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 21:09   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-09-30 21:25     ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 22:13       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 07/17] iptables: implement --line-numbers for iptables -S Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 08/17] iptables-restore: kill unused -b option Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 09/17] doc: rename .8.in files to .8in Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 10/17] doc: add package version to all manpages Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 11/17] doc: fixup omissions in ip6tables-restore.8 Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 12/17] doc: document iptables-restore's -t option Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 13/17] doc: document iptables-restore's -v option Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 14/17] doc: document iptables-restore's -M option Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 15/17] doc: document iptables-restore's -h option Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 16/17] doc: name the supported log levels for ipt_LOG Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 10:22 ` [PATCH 17/17] src: remove faulty deprecated marker in libipt_LOG source Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-30 21:16 ` Mostly documentation fixes Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120930221319.GA18227@1984 \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=jengelh@inai.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).