From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use PTR_RET
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:13:23 +0800
Message-ID: <20121029091323.GA25000@localhost>
References: <20121029004044.GA12982@localhost>
 <20121029090347.GA10521@1984>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:20499 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750968Ab2J2JN0 (ORCPT <rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:13:26 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121029090347.GA10521@1984>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:03:47AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:40:44AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Use PTR_RET rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
> > 
> > Generated by: coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 
> I have collapsed this patch and the one for ipv6/iptable_nat.c. They
> are pretty small and description is the same.

That would be good, thanks!

Thanks,
Fengguang