From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sclark46@earthlink.net
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fedora plans to replace iptables with firewalld
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:45:15 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115.154515.1601270379989323660.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A5530A.9000509@earthlink.net>
From: Stephen Clark <sclark46@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:39:38 -0500
> On 11/15/2012 02:37 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Stephen Clark<sclark46@earthlink.net>
>> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:30:21 -0500
>>
>>> Is anyone here aware that fedora is planning on replacing iptables
>>> with something called firewalld?
>> It's an abstraction layer built on top of iptables and ebtables,
>> not a replacement.
>>
>> A simple read of the project web site would have told you this,
>> and I encourage you to do some research in the future instead
>> of spreading misinformation.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> This is not what it says in the feature page at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default#Detailed_Description
The "service" as in the user level scripts, not the kernel level
components.
Read the project page, for real:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD
Where it explicitly says:
====================
Adding an abstraction layer on top of ip*tables and ebtables firewall
rules makes adding rules simple and more intuitive. The abstraction
layer needs to be powerful, but also simple, which makes this not an
easy task. A firewall language has to gen invented for this. Firewall
rules have a fixed position and querying generic information about
access state, access policies for ports and other firewall features is
possible.
====================
Please stop wasting everyone's time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 19:30 fedora plans to replace iptables with firewalld Stephen Clark
2012-11-15 19:37 ` David Miller
2012-11-15 20:39 ` Stephen Clark
2012-11-15 20:45 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-03-02 0:16 ` Asshole kicker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121115.154515.1601270379989323660.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sclark46@earthlink.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).