From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Andreas Herz <andi@geekosphere.org>
Cc: Netfilter user mailing list <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Formal submission of Xtables2
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:57:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121216235751.GA7528@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121214094141.GO2606@workstation>
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Andreas Herz wrote:
> On 13/12/12 at 12:00, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:00:07AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Please consider for merging.
> >
> > nftables and its compatibility layer already provide this and we will
> > not have to maintain two different netlink interfaces, which is too
> > much overhead.
>
> Apart of your discussion (i think it's quite interesting although
> you might not agree), is there a summary of the status of nftables?
> The last time i read about it, while i was at the university, i
> thought it was dead. I read that Patrick McHardy was the one
> pushing the project but never heard any news after 2010. Now i read
> that Pablo is taking care of it.
It's true that nftables suffered an hiatus in its development, but
we're back on it and there has been quite a lot of activity on it
recently. This is the kernel branch, you can check the changelog here:
http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/nf-next/log/?h=nf_tables8
And there's an iptables compatibility layer that is ready for IPv4,
you can find details here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg23831.html
> So i would love to hear more details on the roadmap for nftables, might
> be interesting for me and my work here.
I understand you want to know more on the future of nftables, but
because the way I am, I prefer to skip "hot air" wording by now and
talk on code done anytime soon.
So I have to request some patience from you. We promise to deliver as
much information as possible once we are done with the core features.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-16 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-13 6:00 Formal submission of Xtables2 Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-13 11:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-13 11:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-13 12:05 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-13 13:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-13 14:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-13 14:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-13 15:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-13 16:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-13 17:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-13 18:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-17 0:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-17 1:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-17 9:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-17 10:12 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-12-17 13:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-17 14:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-17 20:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-17 23:49 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-12-18 1:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-18 1:27 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20121214094141.GO2606@workstation>
2012-12-16 23:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121216235751.GA7528@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=andi@geekosphere.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).