From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Formal submission of Xtables2
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:08:41 +0100
Message-ID: <20121217000841.GA9331@1984>
References: <20121213110046.GA22337@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212131214100.20007@nerf07.vanv.qr>
 <20121213120509.GA26118@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212131405170.786@nerf07.vanv.qr>
 <20121213142820.GA3489@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212131528410.1273@nerf07.vanv.qr>
 <20121213151615.GA6962@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212131623480.10856@nerf07.vanv.qr>
 <20121213172523.GB14333@1984>
 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212131826040.5486@nerf07.vanv.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netfilter user mailing list <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212131826040.5486@nerf07.vanv.qr>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:19:28PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
[...]
> Each of us are (understandably) biased, as each has contributed
> to "their" implementation. But, you also have the decisive power as
> the Linux kernel Netfilter subsystem maintainer, and I fear that you
> might use this to reject xt2 to force nft.

I have to ask you to stick to technical arguments. Discrediting me
here in the mailing list and everywhere and using irritating wording
will not help to get this mainstream. Stop this.